Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Brief Version): Analysis with Item Response Theory

Simple item page JFLF
dc.creatorAbal, Facundo Juan Pablo
dc.creatorUrsino, Damián Javier
dc.creatorAttorresi , Horacio Félix
dc.date2022-02-03
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-12T00:11:48Z
dc.date.available2024-09-12T00:11:48Z
dc.descriptionThe aim of this work is to provide new evidence of psychometric quality for the Argentinean adaptation of the brief version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ-RS). 1136 people from the general population (52.5% female, mean age = 29.6 years, SD = 11.9) residing in Buenos Aires, Argentina participated. The Argentinean adaptation consists of 42 items with dichotomous response format. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed from the tetrachoric correlation matrix. This allowed replicating the structure proposed by Eysenck for the PEN model (Psychoticism - Extroversion - Neuroticism) and the Lie scale. Subsequently, the two-parameter logistic model was adjusted separately for the items of each scale. The items did not show differential functioning by gender. Items discrimination was moderate-high. Parameters b were located in narrow ranges of each one of the measured traits, which caused the precision of the scales to vary along the trait continuums. The Neuroticism scale provides more information at medium levels of the trait, Psychoticism in the medium-low and Extraversion in the medium-high. The Lie scale showed a relatively flat information function throughout the trait. Evidence of validity based on the relationship with other tests that measure facets of neuroticism and symptomatology is provided. The evidence of validity and reliability obtained offers sufficient quality guarantees for the application of this instrument in the local context and confirms topicality of the theoretical model that operationalizes the EPQ-RS.en-US
dc.descriptionEl objetivo de este trabajo es aportar nuevas evidencias de calidad psicométrica para la adaptación argentina de la versión reducida del Cuestionario de Personalidad de Eysenck (EPQ-RS). Participaron 1136 personas de población general (52.5% femenino, edad media = 29.6 años, DE = 11.9) residentes en Buenos Aires, Argentina. La adaptación argentina se compone de 42 ítems con formato de respuesta dicotómica. Se realizó un análisis factorial confirmatorio a partir de la matriz de correlaciones tetracóricas. Esto permitió replicar la estructura propuesta por Eysenck para el modelo PEN (Psicoticismo-Extraversión-Neuroticismo) y la escala Sinceridad. Posteriormente, se ajustó el modelo logístico de dos parámetros por separado para los ítems de cada escala. Los ítems no mostraron funcionamiento diferencial según género. La discriminación de los ítems resultó moderada-alta. Los parámetros b se localizaron en rangos acotados de cada uno de los rasgos medidos, lo que originó que la precisión de las escalas varíe en el recorrido de los continuos. La escala Neuroticismo aporta más información en niveles medios del rasgo, Psicoticismo en los medio-bajos y Extraversión en los medio-altos. La escala Sinceridad mostró una función de información relativamente plana en todo el recorrido del rasgo. Se brindan evidencias de validez basadas en la relación con otras pruebas que miden facetas del neuroticismo y sintomatología. Las evidencias de validez y confiabilidad obtenidas ofrecen garantías de calidad suficientes para la aplicación de este instrumento en el contexto local y confirman la vigencia del modelo teórico que operacionaliza el EPQ-RS.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/5830
dc.identifier.urihttps://ciencianacional.co/handle/123456789/206591
dc.journalCES Psicología
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad CESes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ces.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/5830/3612
dc.relation/*ref*/Abal, F.J.P., Auné, S.E., & Attorresi, H.F. (2015). Relación entre la Deseabilidad Social y los parámetros del Modelo Logístico de tres parámetros. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 5(1), 5-24.
dc.relation/*ref*/Abal, F. J. P., Auné, S. E., & Attorresi, H. F. (2018). Variación de la escala Likert en el test de Utilidad de la Matemática. Interacciones, 4(3), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.24016/2018.v4n3.134
dc.relation/*ref*/Abal, F. J. P., Auné, S. E., & Attorresi, H. F. (2019). Construcción de un banco de ítems de Facetas de Neuroticismo para el desarrollo de un test adaptativo. Psicodebate, 19(1), 31-50. https://doi.org/10.18682/pd.v1i1.854
dc.relation/*ref*/Abal, F. J. P., Lozzia, G. S., Aguerri, M. E., Galibert, M. S., & Attorresi, H. F. (2010). La escasa aplicación de la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem en tests de ejecución típica. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 19(1), 111 – 122. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v19.n1.23877
dc.relation/*ref*/Alexopoulos, D. S., & Kalaitzidis, I. (2004). Psychometric properties of Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) Short Scale in Greece. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(6), 1205-1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.12.005
dc.relation/*ref*/Almiro, P. A, Moura, O., & Simões, M. R. (2016). Psychometric properties of the European Portuguese version of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Revised (EPQ-R). Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.050
dc.relation/*ref*/Aluja, A., García, O., & García, F. A. (2003). Psychometric analysis of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Short Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(2), 449-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00206-4
dc.relation/*ref*/Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (2017). The Basics of Item Response Theory Using R. Cham, Suiza: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54205-8
dc.relation/*ref*/Bauermeister, S., & Gallacher, J. (2020). A psychometric evaluation of the 12-item EPQ-R neuroticism scale in 502,591 UK Biobank participants using item response theory (IRT). BioRxiv 741249, https://doi.org/10.1101/741249
dc.relation/*ref*/Bech, P. (2016). Neuroticism (Eysenck’s Theory). En V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1-4). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1094-1
dc.relation/*ref*/Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. En F. M. Lord y M. R. Novick (Eds.). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
dc.relation/*ref*/Bowden, S. C., Saklofske, D. H., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Sudarshan, N. J., & Eysenck, D. B. G. (2016). Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire across 33 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.028
dc.relation/*ref*/Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basics, concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S.H.C. (2011). IRTPRO 4.2 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
dc.relation/*ref*/Calderón Garrido, C., Navarro González, D., Lorenzo Seva, U., & Ferrando Piera, P. J. (2019). Multidimensional or essentially unidimensional? A multi-faceted factor-analytic approach for assessing the dimensionality of tests and items. Psicothema, 31(4), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.153
dc.relation/*ref*/Castellanos-Ryan, N., Brière, F.N., O’Leary-Barrett, M., Banaschewski, T., Bokde, A., & Bromberg, U. (2016). The structure of psychopathology in adolescence and its common personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(8), 1039-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000193
dc.relation/*ref*/Casullo, M. (2004). Síntomas psicopatológicos en adultos urbanos. Psicología y Ciencia Social, 6(1), 49-57.
dc.relation/*ref*/Chen, W., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165285
dc.relation/*ref*/Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2018). Using Item Response Theory for the development of a new short form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1834. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01834
dc.relation/*ref*/Colledani, D., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E. (2019). Development of a new abbreviated form of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised with multidimensional item response theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.044
dc.relation/*ref*/Colledani, D., Robusto, E., & Anselmi, P. (2018). Development of a new abbreviated form of the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised. Personality and Individual Differences, 120, 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.037
dc.relation/*ref*/De Ayala, R. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: Guilford Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Derogatis, L. (1994). SCL-90-R. Symptom Checklist-90-R. Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis: National Computer System.
dc.relation/*ref*/DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park: Sage publications.
dc.relation/*ref*/Dominguez, S., Villegas, G., Yauri, S., Aravena, S., & Ramírez, F. (2013). Análisis psicométrico preliminar de la forma corta del EPQ R en una muestra de estudiantes universitarios de Lima Metropolitana. Avances en Psicología,21(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.33539/avpsicol.2013.v21n1.308
dc.relation/*ref*/Ebesutani, C., Regan, J., Smith, A., Reise, S., Higa-McMillan, C., & Chorpita, B. F. (2012). The 10-Item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children, Child and Parent Shortened Versions: Application of Item Response Theory for More Efficient Assessment. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 34(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-011-9273-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Escorial, S., & Navas, M. J. (2007). Analysis of the gender variable in the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire–revised scales using differential item functioning techniques. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 990-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406299108
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and Individual Differences: A natural science approach. New York: Plenum.
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, H. J. (1947). Dimensions of Personality. Londres: Routledge y Kegan Paul.
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. Londres: Routledge y Kegan Paul.
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: the three major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00915.x
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Londres: Hodder and Stoughton.
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, H. J., Wilson, G. D., & Jackson, C. J. (1996). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Profiler (Short). Guilford: Psi-Press.
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, S. B. G., & Barrett, P. (2013). Re-introduction to cross-cultural studies of the EPQ. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(4), 485-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.09.022.
dc.relation/*ref*/Eysenck, S. B. G., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferrando, P. J. (2003). The accuracy o the E, N and P trait estimates: An empirical study using the EPQ-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00053-3
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: Origins, development and future directions. Psicothema, 29, 236-240. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.304
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2018). Assessing the Quality and Appropriateness of Factor Solutions and Factor Score Estimates in Exploratory Item Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78, 762-780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164417719308
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferrando, P. J., & Navarro-González, D. (2018). Assessing the quality and usefulness of factor-analytic applications to personality measures: A study with the statistical anxiety scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.014.
dc.relation/*ref*/Forrest, S., Lewis, C.A., & Shevlin, M. (2000). Examining the factor structure and differential functioning of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Abbreviated. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(3), 579-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00220-2
dc.relation/*ref*/Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): its use among students in England, Canada, the USA and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 443–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90073-X
dc.relation/*ref*/Francis, L. J., Lewis, C. A., & Ziebertz, H. (2006). The short-form revised Eysenck personality Questionnaire (EPQ-S): A German edition. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 34(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.197
dc.relation/*ref*/Furnham, A., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Saklofske, D. H. (2008). The Eysenck personality measures: Fifty years of scale development. En G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, y D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment: Vol. 2 — Personality measurement and testing (pp. 199–218). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n10
dc.relation/*ref*/González, I., Déjean, S., Martin, P., & Baccini, A. (2008). CCA: An R Package to Extend Canonical Correlation Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 23(12), 1 - 14. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v023.i12
dc.relation/*ref*/Jylhä, P., & Isometsä, E. (2006). The relationship of neuroticism and extraversion to symptoms of anxiety and depression in the general population. Depression and Anxiety, 23(5), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20167
dc.relation/*ref*/Katz, Y. J., & Francis, L. J. (1991). The dual nature of the EPQ Lie scale? A study among university students in Israel. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 19(4), 217–222. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1991.19.4.217
dc.relation/*ref*/Knežević, G., Lazarević, L. B., Purić, D., Bosnjak, M., Teovanović, P., Petrović, B., & Opačić, G. (2019). Does Eysenck's personality model capture psychosis-proneness? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lewis, C. A. & Musharraf, S. (2014). The short form Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQR-S) and the revised abbreviated Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A): Urdu translations. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 64(2), 225-226.
dc.relation/*ref*/Lewis, C. A., Francis, L. J., Shevlin, M., & Forrest, S. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the French translation of the Abbreviated Form of the Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQR-A). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.18.2.179
dc.relation/*ref*/Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361
dc.relation/*ref*/Lozano, L.M., García-Cueto, E. & Muñiz, J. (2008). Effect of the Number of Response Categories on the Reliability and Validity of Rating Scales. Methodology, 4 (2), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.73
dc.relation/*ref*/Makransky, G., Mortensen, E. L., & Glas, C. A. (2013). Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computer adaptive testing: An illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 20, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112437756
dc.relation/*ref*/Massey, A. (1980). The Eysenck Personality Inventory Lie Scale: Lack of insight or …? The Irish Journal of Psychology, 4(3), 172-174.
dc.relation/*ref*/McCrae, R. R. & Costa P. T. (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
dc.relation/*ref*/Min, H., Zickar, M. & Yankov, G. (2018). Understanding item parameters in personality scales: An explanatory item response modeling approach, Personality and Individual Differences, 128, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.012
dc.relation/*ref*/Mitchell, R. L. C., & Kumari, V. (2016). Hans Eysenck's interface between the brain and personality: Modern evidence on the cognitive neuroscience of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.009
dc.relation/*ref*/Muñiz, J. (2018). Introducción a la psicometría: teoría clásica y TRI. Madrid: Pirámides.
dc.relation/*ref*/Muñiz, J., García-Cueto, E. & Lozano, L. M. (2005). Item format and the psychometric properties of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 38 (1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.03.021
dc.relation/*ref*/Muraki, E. & Muraki, M. (2016). Generalized Partial Credit Model. En W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory, Volume One: Models (pp. 127-135). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
dc.relation/*ref*/Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus User’s Guide, 6th Edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
dc.relation/*ref*/Nieto, M. D., Abad, F. J., Hernández-Camacho, A., Garrido, L. E., Barrada, J. R., Aguado, D. & Olea, J. (2017). Calibrating a new item pool to adaptively assess the Big Five. Psicothema, 29(3), 390-395. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.391
dc.relation/*ref*/Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further Investigation of the Performance of S-χ2 : An Item Fit Index for Use With Dichotomous Item Response Theory Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27(4), 289- 298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621603027004004
dc.relation/*ref*/Reise, S. & Waller, N. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553
dc.relation/*ref*/Reise, S. P. & Revicki, D. A. (2015). Handbook of Item Response Theory Modeling Applications to Typical Performance Assessment. Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.relation/*ref*/Reise, S. P. & Waller, N. G. (1990). Fitting the two-parameter model to personality data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169001400105
dc.relation/*ref*/Reise, S. P., & Rodriguez, A. (2016). Item response theory and the measurement of psychiatric constructs: some empirical and conceptual issues and challenges. Psychological Medicine, 46(10), 2025–2039. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000520
dc.relation/*ref*/Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual review of clinical psychology, 5, 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553
dc.relation/*ref*/Revelle, W. (2016). Hans Eysenck: Personality theorist. Personality and Individual Differences, 103, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.007
dc.relation/*ref*/Samejima, F. (2016). Graded response models. En W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of item response theory, Volume One: Models (pp. 95-108). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
dc.relation/*ref*/Sanchez, R. O. & Ledesma, R. D. (2009). Análisis psicométrico del Inventario de Síntomas Revisado (SCL-90-R) en población clínica. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 18(3), 265-274.
dc.relation/*ref*/Squillace, M., Picón Janeiro, J., & Schmidt, V. (2013). Adaptación local del Cuestionario Revisado de Personalidad de Eysenck (Versión abreviada). Evaluar, 13, 19-37. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v13.n1.6794
dc.relation/*ref*/Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological methods, 16(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
dc.relation/*ref*/Tiwari, T., Singh, A. L, & Singh, I. L. (2009). The Short-Form Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: A Hindi edition (EPQRS-H). Industrial psychiatry journal, 18(1), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.57854
dc.relation/*ref*/Toland, M. (2013). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511332
dc.relation/*ref*/Toland, M. D., Sulis, I., Giambona, F., Porcu, M., & Campbell, J. M. (2017). Introduction to bifactor polytomous item response theory analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 60, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2016.11.001
dc.relation/*ref*/Wiberg, M. (2012). Can a multidimensional test be evaluated with unidimensional item response theory? Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(4), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.670416
dc.relation.institutionUniversidad CES
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 Facundo Juan Pablo Abal, Damián Javier Ursino , Horacio Félix Attorresies-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceCES Psicología; Vol. 15 No. 1 (2022): CES Psicología; 1-23en-US
dc.sourceCES Psicología; Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2022): CES Psicología; 1-23es-ES
dc.sourceCES Psicología; v. 15 n. 1 (2022): CES Psicología; 1-23pt-BR
dc.source2011-3080
dc.subjectneuroticismen-US
dc.subjectpsychoticismen-US
dc.subjectextraversionen-US
dc.subjectlieen-US
dc.subjecttwo-parameter logistic modelen-US
dc.subjectpersonality assessmenten-US
dc.subjectEPQ-RSen-US
dc.subjectneuroticismoes-ES
dc.subjectpsicoticismoes-ES
dc.subjectextraversiones-ES
dc.subjectsinceridades-ES
dc.subjectmodelo logístico de dos parámetroses-ES
dc.subjectevaluación de la personalidades-ES
dc.subjectEPQ-RSes-ES
dc.titleRevised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Brief Version): Analysis with Item Response Theoryen-US
dc.titleCuestionario Revisado de Personalidad de Eysenck (versión reducida): análisis con la teoría de respuesta al ítemes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeArtículo Originales-ES

Files

Collections

vol. 15 núm. 1 (2022): ces psicología