The absence of legislation and controls newspapers, predisposes its editorial management (decisions on what to report) does not consider the point of view of citizens; especially when it is associated with violent or tragic events news. This research was to develop constructs to promote the active role of readers in newspapers and thus shaping the dynamics citizen participation and editorial management of the press.

The study analyzed conversations of two groups of Facebook: Venezuelans in Colombia and Venezuelans in Chile 2.0, to know the type of participation, formed groups, as well as the dialogic interaction. It was concluded that Facebook contributes with the participation and integration of Venezuelan immigrants; nevertheless, they are public groups, with bilateral dialogues and participation that remains in the Having Party

Social networks have become a mechanism for information, recreation, and opinion for users of this type of virtual platforms; precisely, these are the three functions of traditional social communication. Networks are also a tool that the media takes into account when deciding what is the news of the moment. The study revolved around the prevailing news agenda during the 2017 protests in Venezuela based on social networks and supported by journalistic genres, as well as the relationship between human dignity and the way violent events with fatalities were reported. The newspapers El Universal and El Nacional, in their digital version, were studied by means of precision cards in the news related to 7 events involving fatal victims of the protests. It is concluded that, in some information released by these newspapers, some tweets were quoted, and photos and videos that had circulated in the networks were posted. Furthermore, in some of the cases studied, these media spread videos and photographs of the events that reproduced the moment in which the victims died, which defines a sensationalist, commercial and disrespectful news agenda.