This article seeks to show that decisions by Supreme Courts, regardless of the latitude, depend upon the philosophical system of the legal operator. Ths idea goes beyond the concept that the normative system determines the legal result and seeks instead to establish the idea that legal operators make legal policy decisions. Th Argentine jurisprudential framework is nothing more than an excuse, because, in the strictest sense, if a meta-ethical analysis is made of any Supreme Court, the result will point to judicial